Posts in Special Reports
☆ Election roundup (5/14): Experts recall spellbinding wins, surprises, takeaways from Nov. 2024

In this exclusive installment of a special Opp Now Election '24 series, our contributors aren't dancing around the issues: they unpack, below, some key City/County election results—including how “low information voters” impact which candidates are, or aren't, given a whirl in office. From Tobin Gilman (SJ community leader), Gus Mattammal (Midcoast Community councilmember), Mark Burns (local real estate agent), and Pierluigi Oliverio (SJ planning commissioner).

Read More
☆ Why local voters passed Proposition 36—by a gigantic margin

Welp, it happened: 69.8% of Bay Areans (and 68.9% CA-wide) voted “yes” to reinstating felony charges for certain property crimes and establishing “treatment-mandated felonies” for some repeat offenders. But why was Prop 36 so overwhelmingly supported? In this exclusive, we trace back Opp Now's Prop 47 & Prop 36 coverage, beginning in January 2022 and up 'til Election Day.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (4/14): Are local voters and our politicians tragically star-crossed?

Gov. Newsom campaigned fervently against Prop 36, but it passed—with 68.9% voting “yes” (69.8% in SCC). SJ Council endorsed Prop 5 (8–2), but most County/State voters (respectively, 54.3% and 55.5%) couldn't stomach it and voted “no.” In this Opp Now exclusive, SJ community leader Tobin Gilman and HJTA's Susan Shelley analyze this startling disconnect—between local politicians and the people they are supposed to represent.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (3/14): Why SCC voters broke up with Prop 5 (and they're never, ever getting back together)

Proposition 5 (lowering CA's voter approval req't for infrastructure bonds) was wholeheartedly rejected by State and County voters this cycle. Below, SV Taxpayers Ass'n board member John Inks explains why. For this Opp Now exclusive installment, we also talked to transit expert Tom Rubin and real estate agent Mark Burns, who share some wins (and annoyances) from Election '24.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (2/14): Should cities like SJ consider Ranked-Choice Voting?

Continuing our exclusive Opp Now post-election series, we hear today from Brian Holtz, SCC Libertarian Party secretary and Purissima Hills Water District director. Below, Holtz argues that SF's Ranked-Choice Voting system (in place since 2004) allows voters to elect more reasonable, broadly-supported candidates—not just pick the prettier of two evils.

Read More
☆ Poetry: Autumn storms weep, gnash, and erupt into sublimity

Our very own editor Lauren Oliver celebrates San Jose's first fall rain, below, with an elegant two-stanza poem that recalls the exquisite, otherworldly feelings of wonder we have after a storm's passed. An Opp Now exclusive.

Read More
☆ Election roundup (1/14): Pleasant surprises re: local voters, campaigns, & media

Phew. Another election on the books. Over the next week, we'll be highlighting Opp Now contributors' exclusive takes on (local and statewide) Nov. 2024 wins, flops, and possible next steps. Today, we feature delightful eye-openers from: HJTA's Susan Shelley, Independent Leadership Group's Irene Smith, SJ Housing Commissioner Roberta Moore, and former Palo Alto Mayor Lydia Kou.

Read More
☆ Tanaka takeaways on recent election: Time for smart, data-driven governance

Palo Alto councilmember Greg Tananka says that local governments should not ignore the real message of the November 5 election: The People want lean, efficient government. An Opp Now exclusive.

Read More
☆ HJTA’s Susan Shelley: Prop 5 helps local governments trick voters into generational debt (part 4)

Prop 5 opens the door to more gov't borrowing by reducing the voter threshold to 55% for local bonds. This further incentivizes governments to mislead voters on ballot labels and “informational” mailings. In part 4 of this Opp Now exclusive Q&A, Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Ass’n’s Susan Shelley points to tax hike trickery now in play, from school bonds—which already only need 55% approval—to the widely abused Upland exemption. Overtaxed Californians are grumbling, but Prop 5 can override their opposition, says Shelley.

Read More
☆ Bay Area profs on refining our understanding of history via literature (part 2)

Perhaps a well-told story (or mural, like SF Post Office's “Indians by the Golden Gate,” above) is the best way to learn not just history's facts—but its struggles, nuances, and questions. In this Opp Now exclusive, history profs recommend books for better knowing and navigating life's currents: spanning from CA's indigenous peoples, to colonial Indian ethics, to a Nazi German town that still “puzzles” historians.

Read More
☆ HJTA’s Susan Shelley: Look out for more RM4’s—Prop 5 to jumpstart a frenzy of bonds that tax people out of their homes (part 3)

Upending norms that date back to 1849, Prop 5 strips taxpayer protections that are enshrined in the State Constitution and reinforced by Prop 13—says Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association’s Susan Shelley in this Opp Now exclusive Q&A. While the Bay Area’s RM4 may have been a uniquely spectacular ask, she warns it’s just the beginning: property owners should get ready for a relentless series of abusive bond measures every election, now and forever.

Read More
☆ HJTA’s Susan Shelley: Prop 5’s ballot label under-informs voters because governments just want more tax money (part 2)

Prop 5 lowers the votes needed for most local bonds from two-thirds to 55%, but you wouldn’t know it if you read the ballot label. In part 2 of this Opp Now exclusive Q&A, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn’s Susan Shelley discusses how her organization sued the State for more transparency but lost on appeal. Voters might even think Prop 5 raises the threshold for expensive borrowing. Instead, Prop 5 could soon nudge CA cities into bankruptcy.

Read More